Sunday, July 09, 2006

Religous Liberties


The World Overcomes Outreach Ministries of Memphis, the pastor of which is “Apostle” Alton R. Williams, can be easily found at the intersection of Kirby Park and Winchester, due to the recent addition of a 72 foot tall likeness of The Statue Of Liberty. The church also boasts a school, bowling alley, roller rink, bookstore, and according to the pastor, 12,000 members, predominantly black.

Dubbed The Statue of Liberty Through Christ, the statue holds a cross instead of a torch, and in the other arm, a tablet pair on which is engraved the Ten Commandments. According to the pastor, the statue was originally presented by France as a welcome to freedom for Americas recently freed former black slave population, and was only after received changed to represent a welcoming of immigrants.

Aside from this rather interesting historical revision, the statue seems to represent exactly what one would expect, the idea that America is a Christian nation, it’s laws were based on Judaeo Christian philosophy, etc. All of which is true, of course, but only partially so, I would submit only minorly so. But why quibble?

I am no expert, but if I recall correctly, one of the commandments on the tablet the lady holds in one arm has the admonition, “thou shalt make unto thee no graven images”. It goes on to explain that this is not a reference merely to human figures, but also to animals, birds, fish, and creeping things of the earth. Although the commandment states that you should not bow down to worship them, every word of this comandment was taken as a separate law unto itself, was believed literally, and for the most part adhered to rigorously.

A time traveller from today to ancient Israel in the time of King David, for example, would be hard pressed to find any statuary. In fact, it would be impossible to find any, not only in any public buildings or parks, but not in any private homes as well. Nor would you find any depictions of any kind of living thing in any kind of artwork whatsoever. The one sole exception seems to have been the two winged cherubim that rested atop the arc of the covenant, which of course was unavailiable for viewing by any save the priesthood, at least after the first temple was buildt.

Our hypothetical time traveller would likely even be stoned were he to present photographs from his wallet of himself and his family, for making a god of himself. Yes, I’m serious. They were that serious about these laws in those days, which all the more leads me to wonder why Christians today make such a big deal about displaying the commandments. Very few Christians actually observe them in the intended way, even the very fundamnetalists who want to force them on everybody else. For that matter, the vast majority if not all Jews no longer follow to the original intent this old prohibition against idols-which according to the original intent of the scriptures is what this and other such statues most surely are.

Now I know a good many Christians will object that ordinary statues are most certainly not idols, and they will vehemently deny that the Statue of Liberty or this likeness of her are idols as well. They will point out that no one worships the statues as though they were goddesses. They are symbolic representations of an ideal, which we can look upon and use as a channel to reflect upon that ideal, as a means of inspiring us to strive to be worthy of it. To which I would reply-

EXACTLY RIGHT!! AND THAT IS EXACTLY HOW PAGAN IDOLS WERE USED.

They as well were not actually living deities in and of themselves, but represented the god or the goddess and the ideals that diety represented, and by reflecting on them, in meditation, you sought to attune with the deity and those ideals, which you would hopefully be inspired to strive to be worthy of in some small way.

Sure, you can split hairs and point out the obvious differences, but it doesn’t matter. Acording to Mosaic law, a graven image of any kind was a potential idol, and held the danger of drawing you into idolatry. The good pastor of this church- the “Apostle” Williams- should reflect upon that the next time he gazes upon the likeness of the Goddess of Liberty.

And, by the way, Pastor Williams- should you by chance happen upon this post- kindly give my regards.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Since there are actually three separate sets of Ten Commandments (Exod. 20, Exod. 34, Deut. 5) I have to wonder which of those this statue is holding.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Is that right? Damn, I didn't even know that. That gives a Ten Commandments afficianado a choice on the menu,huh?

fondfire said...

Exodus 34 is a set of rules considerably unlike what we usually call "The Ten Commandments," but these are the ten that God put into the stone tablets. If Israel observes these ten, God swore to help them drive out all the peoples of Canaan so that they could have it for themselves.

Exodus 20:2-17 and Deuteronomy 5:6-21 are quite similar. That's what people mean when they normally say "The Ten Commandments."

However, it's interesting that God actually "hand carved" the ten at Exodus 34 onto tablets and that those are the only commandments described by something like the phrase "Ten Commandments" in Hebrew in the text itself. (So, the movie is a little off . . .)

It's mighty interesting, when you think about this . . . God didn't hand-carve the rules many Christians would enshrine as the cornerstone of all ethics, but instead gave that distinction to ten rules about keeping seperate from the religions and peoples of ancient Canaan. However, the laws at Exodus 20 are the first laws God sets down in the Pentateuch, IIRC.

SecondComingOfBast said...

I wasn't aware of that either, I thought the commandments given to Moses on Sinai were the same ones we generally consider the Ten Commandments.

fondfire said...

The ones we consider the Ten Commandments were given on Sinai, but not carved by God Hi'zelf into tablets . . . (Well, unless I just misread Exodus . . . Please go ahead and point me out to my reading mistakes, if I'm wrong, which is possible since I'm just doing a quick-read here . . .) Seems that only those other ten were carved into tablets by God's own ethereal fingers.

fondfire said...

BTW, online RSV. One of the more accurate translations for making a Biblical point . . .

fondfire said...

OK, I'm reading further . . .

It seems our set of ten commandments, and a whole lot else besides, were given to Moses on two tablets. At least, after God goes on a long monologue from Exodus 19-31, he gives Moses two stone tablets "written on both sides; on the one side and on the other were they written. And the tables were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, graven upon the tables." But then Moses got mad and smashed those (Exodus 32:19), which seems an odd thing to do with God's Law out of anger, but there you are. Anyway, God decides to set-up the tablets with Moses again in Exodus 34. That's when the second set of different ten commandments (actually called by that name) are given. And if I'm reading the account correctly, it says that that set was carved into stone by Moses (not God) and that those ten really represent the covenant with God. Hmmmm. I'll have to reread Exodus and think about this very carefully . . .

Anyway, Orthodox Jews believe that only Jews are actually subject by God to either set of the Ten Commandments. Everbody else is under the Torah of Noah, given in Genesis 8:15-9:17. As far as the Rabbis are concerned, this is the only law that applies to absolutely everyone, regardless of their background. The Rabbis extrapolated this into the seven laws of Noah. There is apparently a mega-tiny movement of Gentiles who don't believe that Jesus was the Messiah, but do believe that Tanakh is the real one, true, and only God's rvelations. They've established churches entirely built around the idea of the seven laws of Noah . . .

http://www.jewfaq.org/gentiles.htm
http://www.noahide.org/

I saw a book in the local library about this once . . .

(Why am I addicted to weird religion? Why??? Why??????)

SecondComingOfBast said...

It's a fascinating subject, from a historical and a sociological perspective, as well as anthropological, archaeological, and psychological. Perfectly understandable.

fondfire said...

It's the main reason people do things outside of predictable, practical reasons. It's the essence of most cultures. I can't help being fascinated for that reason alone!

I have a traditionalist Catholic who went on a minor rant on the Church Critics blog today, for instance. Interesting. "The power of BS compells me, the power of BS compells me . . ."

;-)