Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Electoral Magical Mischief

Isaac Bonewitz has posted a magical strategy to help win the election for the Democratic Party. Not negative magic, mind you, but purely ethical, positive magic to insure everybody knows everything about the candidates, that there is no skulduggery at poling places, etc.

Ordinarily, I would consider this kind of stuff dumb as hell, but on the other hand, maybe I’m being too harsh. Maybe there’s something to it, and if enough people go along, it could have an impact. I am, however, struck by the inconsistencies involved. You have some people wailing about how Sarah Palin hates witches and pagans and how she even went to the extent of receiving a blessing and a prayer for protection from witchcraft from some African Christian minister. The minister in question at one point encouraged people of an African village that had fallen on hard times to run a witch out of the town, blaming their troubles on her. That Sarah Palin received a blessing from him, at about the time of her successful run for the governor’s seat of Alaska, is supposedly proof that Sarah Palin will assault the civil liberties of pagans in this country.

They accuse her of belonging to a rabidly fundamentalist sect of Christians who engage in a type of spiritual warfare against the “Queen of Heaven” which they interpret to mean the “Goddess” and who interestingly enough others say is the Catholic version of the Virgin Mary-actually the Goddess Ishtar in disguise, you might say.

Of course, Palin’s ties to these kinds of people are tentative at best, and she states that she is no longer a member of that church. Nevertheless, since she is a Republican, and John McCain’s running mate, and is a Pro-Life fundamentalist Christian, then everything about her is fair game-including everything about her family and every conceivable bit of dirt they can dig up about her and them, real or imagined. Most if not all of it is made up out of thin air, but hey-all in a “good cause”-right, guys and girls?

Now, Bonewitz is actively encouraging participating in magical rituals meant to influence the election. It would seem that Palin’s blessing for protection from witchcraft might not have been so off the wall after all.

Well, two or more can play that game, so I think I’ll join in. This might well be the first of a series. However, hate to break it to you folks, but I don’t intend to limit myself to “positive” or “ethical” magic. I’m going to do what it takes to get the job done, and what better way to start than with my own response to Bonetwitz’s post, all of which I here reproduce.

Boneheads states-

We’re coming down to the end of the campaigns and the actual voting. Here’s what we need to be doing in the next few weeks to assure a fair and honest election. Pick one and get to work!
Do the mundane stuff: Make sure you and your friends and neighbors are registered to vote and have not been accidentally-on-purpose purged from the voting rolls (see previous blog post). Volunteer to work at the polls. If you have a legal background, volunteer with the ACLU and other groups keeping an eye on the process.
Do the magical stuff


“Volunteer with the ACLU?” So much for ethical and positive endeavors.

Following is his list of suggestions, which I place in italics, followed by my responses in bold. But first, I suggested what might be the most appropriate magic ritual of all-


How about a spell on the news media to make them as objective as they like to pretend they are? Failing that, how about a spell to make Keith Olbermann’s tongue swell up to ten times its normal size, for Charlie Gibson to suddenly fall victim to spontaneous combustion, for that thrill running down Chris Matthews leg to rare up and rip through his slacks, and for Katie Couric to suddenly be afflicted with Tourette’s SYndrome, all on live television.
As for-

“Continue with protection spells on the candidates.”

Been there done that. I’ve been calling on Artemis to grant Palin her protection and a degree of her power

“Continue with revelation spells on the candidates and the White House, so that everyone’s true intentions are made public.”

Apollo is appropriate for this to make sure that everyone in America becomes familiar with the name Saul Alinsky, as well as the true degree of association between terrorist Bill Ayers and Barak Obama over the years.

While we’re at it, maybe its time everybody was made aware of the true extent of Democratic policies as the cause of the current housing/banking/Wall Street/mortgage etc. financial crisis, vis-a vie forcing banks to make dubious at best loans to poor borrowers whom they knew had questionable ability to pay them off, and threatening them with sanctions if they refused to do so.

How about we make sure ol’ Apollo points out how Chris Dodd, the largest recipient of largesse from Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac, was the Democratic chairman of the sub-committee charged with oversight of these quasi-governmental institutions. How about the fact the Barnie Frank, the House chairman of the Committee charged with their oversight, refused to allow any bills to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to come to the floor of the House for debate, as did Chris Dodd in the Senate?

And then there’s Barak Obama-who was not only the third largest recipient of their largesse, but included high ranking officials, including a former CEO of one of them, as high ranking officials on his campaign staff?

(Additionally, although I did not think of this at the time, we might also incoke Apollo to bring the facts to light regarding the extent of Obama's associations with Acorn, and that those facts are known to the general public, especially to undecided voters in swing states).

“Find your local polling place(s) and do protection and honesty spells on the buildings.”

What better deity than Hermes to make sure Democratic voters are aware they are risking their freedom by entering any building inhabited by “corrupt” voting officials eager to find evidence of unpaid fines or court date appearance violations?


“Do binding spells on the warmongers in the White House and the Pentagon to prevent any last minute “surprises” that would “justify” postponing or canceling the elections.”


Although this has never happened in the entire history of the United States, including during the Civil War, the Depression, World War II, or the Vietnam conflict with all its attendant Civil Rights and other such civil unrest and outright riots, you make a good point. To this end, lets invoke Ares to mop up the floor with our enemies in Iraq and “Af-han-ees-tawn”, including Al-Queda and the “Tall-ee-bawn”, therefore lessening the likelihood that such a scenario would be deemed necessary and appropriate.
“Remember, if the spell you want to do would be ethical if done physically, then it’s ethical to do it magically”

Hey, I’m all about ethical. What could possibly be more ethical than Katie Couric coming down with Tourette’s Syndrome, or for the things I said should happen to the folks at MSNBC?. The have tanked so much in recent years it might be good for their ratings.
IN CONCLUSION:
So there you have it. Of course, these initial suggestions of mine are not so much magical rituals as they are along the lines of invoking the aid of specific deities.

Like I said, though, I might get into this and offer more spell suggestions. After all, if the Bonewitz's are going to go to this extent for the sake of one candidate and one party, it's only right that I offer some degree of balance.

I understand of course I don't have the reputation or the experience of an Isaac Bonewitz, but on the other hand-this might be loads of fun, and I am under no constraints whatsoever to exercise any modicum of self-control or decorum, or for that matter common decency.

I'm out to win.

14 comments:

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Bonewits? He's the guy with the degree in "magic" from UC - Berkeley, right?

I read "Real Magic" in high school, in my dabbling days.

Can't say it impressed me much, even then.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Beamish, he's probably best known for one section of Real Magic, known as the Bonewitz Cult Danger Evaluation Frame ("ABCDEF"), though it was in the Revised Edition, maybe not the one you read.

Nothing against him personally, really, but anytime somebody considered high up in the pagan world deigns to speak for all pagans and in so doing promotes leftist causes, I have to respond to the contrary-especially being the contrarian that I am.

I just have an idea he wouldn't be so quick to encourage magical interference in an election if he had any idea it would result in an outcome he didn't like.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

I thought the book was okay as an introduction to the bookstore occult, I guess, but the whole "I got a degree in magic from Berkeley" feel of it was politically repellant - too hippy leftist "create-your-own-diploma" for me.

Further into my short journey into the occult, I came to find Bonewits irrelevant to much of the things I was studying. He totally misses the point of Hindu cosmology, for example...

SecondComingOfBast said...

Well, when it comes to modern paganism, what you have is a marriage of shitty scholarship to leftist ideology, resulting in an appeal to leftist fringe elements, particularly feminists and gays. The feminists are attracted to the "history" of a mythical "matriarchal society". I guess gays just like having a religion where they are accepted for what they are. Then of course the earth and nature worshiping aspects attract all the far left environmentalists, the vegetarians and vegans. All together, you have a movement more than an actual religion which is dominated by the left, but not exclusively comprised of them.

Isaac and Phaedra Bonewitz fits firmly in with them, and their and others political activism is focused through a prism of gay and women's reproductive rights and environmentsal activism. Of course no group of leftists of any religious persuasion would be complete without the Gandhi worshiping "peace" activists, or so-called "pacifists".

I pay very little attention to them. I'm in ny own little world, you might say on the fringes of paganism, which by definition would put me closer to the mainstream of normal society.

To me, nature and the environment are important, but should not take precedence over common sense. Gays are welcome as long as they keep it to themselves. They should also stop fucking with gerbils. As a pagan I don't believe in animal abuse, and if sticking an innocent animal up your ass isn't abuse there's no such thing as abuse.

As for women's reproductive freedom, I will counsel any woman against an abortion all day long, but if they go through with it in the end, at least I figure the chances are at least two to one the woman is probably leftist and the odds are probably at least three to one the child would eventually become leftist as well, allowing for the typical period of youthful rebellion.

I think a good compromise, all things considered, is leave it to the states but don't mess with a constitutional amendment against abortion. Maybe have some constitutional mandate for an abortion in the case of the life of the mother, but that would probably be unnecessary anyway, as probably every state would allow for that.

What women mainly need to realize is that just because we worship goddesses, that doesn't make them one, nor does it entitle them as an interest group to special considerations, any more than worshiping a god entitles a man or makes him a god. Most modern pagans are encouraged to see both male and female represented in the divine, so if anything there should be a striving toward more balance, not domination of one toward another. Some of them just don't get that though, or they don't want to.

The pacifism is based on the faulty premise that if you spread peace, kind of like Johnny Appleseed, you will grow peace. These are the same kinds of people that avoid spanking their children when they are most likely to benefit from the experience and then wonder why their kid falls prey to addiction, and ends up either shooting up heroin or shooting up their classroom.

I don't know, I guess maybe in a lot of ways I don't belong with them, but at the same time, I think I'm one of a generally silent group that while definitely a minority is a larger one than might be expected from a group of people that like to dance in circles under the full moon and conduct magical incantations to ancient pagan deities.

I guess where we really part company is in their insistence that we as a group should ban together and trust the Democratic Party to protect our religious freedoms better than Republicans. The sad truth is if we amount to one percent of the US population we are damn lucky, and neither one is going to do much either for us or against us, and that is even provided they even give us so much as a thought.

Of course their answer to that is that the Democrats tend to look out for our general interests as far as the issues that pagans are supposed to care about. My answer to that is they should speak for themselves, not for me or anybody else.

My interest when it comes to political matters is what is best for the USA. Anything else will work itself out eventually once that is taken care of.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Well, when it comes to modern paganism, what you have is a marriage of shitty scholarship to leftist ideology, resulting in an appeal to leftist fringe elements, particularly feminists and gays.

You're describing much of what caused me to once say New Age rhymes with Sewage. A whole pulp industry of ecumenicalized multicultural pop psychology horseshit.

To me, learning a "nature religion" involves no books.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Books can help if you are in an environment where you don't have access to any other way of learning the basics. Unfortunately, most books are rehashes of the same old shit, over and over again, and they all pretty much regurgitate the same ideology as well.

The only person I've ever read extensively is Scott Cunningham. You can learn the basics from him, which is all you need. His books provide a good introductory course, and afterward its pretty much up to you to make of it what you will.

I don't consider myself New Age at all. They are not always the same, though there might be some overlapping in philosophies in some cases. You can be a progressive Christian and be more New Age than an average pagan.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

That's where the ecumenicized multicultural pop psychology bullshit comes in. It fills both Christian, New Age, and pagan bookstores.

I had my fill of it when it got to the point it all seemed color-by-numbers. Even the "who to pray to for money" spells aren't much different.

Neo-paganism seems to be more about a cottage industry than a actual back-to-basics approach.

Not that it's all bad. There's just too much bunk to swat out of the way to find it.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Exactly. I'd like to write a book myself, I can do as good as some of these other people. Fuck all this crap, how many original ways are there to cast circles and invoke the elements? How many could there be?

Of course if I wrote one there's the question of finding a publisher. I just don't believe in the things pagans are all supposedly required to believe in, in the political sense, so that's problematic right there.

Otherwise, I might be hailed as the next Raymond Buckland or Charles Leland, but since I'm not on board with all the love and light and peace and Gorebal Warming hysteria, etc., I would more than likely be the Pagan Joe the Plumber.

So, why bother?

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

You probably should write the book anyway.

The worse that could happen is they'd deny you the fame you deserve by not commanding people to avoid reading you.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Well, the main problem would be finding a publisher. I know it would be good enough, because I would never submit anything to any publisher that wasn't. Nowadays though the market for that kind of stuff is limited, and the liberal seem to have it cornered.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

There's always vanity publishing...

And, you could also make a stink on left-wing dominated pagan blogs. Run a stick across their cages, as it were. That oughta get the more politically minded gasping to debate you.

Just a thought.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Vanity publishing is called that for a reason. I don't know of any best sellers that started out from Vanity presses. Besides, I can't afford that. Even if I could, I wouldn't go that route, for the same reason I wouldn't be inclined to read a book published by a Vanity publisher. I would figure it must not be worth a shit or the author wouldn't have had to pay somebody to publish it.

Some Vanity presses might be better than others at promoting books, but I doubt any of them are going to do more than the bare minimum they have to do. They've already made their money from you, and they pretty much figure its the best they'll do from the arrangement.

I did use to go on pagan e-mail groups and blogs and give my opinion, sometimes pretty obnoxiously. About all you get out of that is people calling you a troll.

If you want to have some fun, look up a Yahoo Group called Voting_Pagans. I'm the only active group moderator left. Go ahead and join the group, you'll get a kick out of it. Besides, I could use some help.

It's supposed to be for pagans, but you don't have to pretend if you don't want to. It would probably be fun to see their reaction to you. They sure give me enough hell for defending conservative Christians, among other things. It might do them good to hear directly from the real thing.

I'll just tell them I let you join the spirit of ecumenicism. HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Well, I'm a conservative-libertarian hybrid of sorts, and only nominally Christian. My path went from fundy Christian to the occult to Norse to Vedic / Babylonian to Hidu and Buddhism, Taoism to Zen and back to Christianity.

You might say I dabbled in a lot of things before settling in to a personal belief that works for me, and I suspect me alone. I wouldn't / couldn't pretend to speak for anyone else on matters of faith.

But, it might be fun.

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Hidu = Hindu (typo)