Gayle Norton-Goodbye And Good Riddance

It looks like somebody in the Republican Bush Administration decided Secretary of The Interior Gayle Norton needed to spend more time with her family. Makes sense, doesn’t it? Especially in the wake of the on-gonig investigation into the shady dealings of lobbyist Jack Abramof. Yeah, the guy that funneled money from Indian tribes, and gaming casinos, into all kinds of shady deals and illegal campaign contributions and the like. See, Gayle Norton, being Secretary of the Interior, is in effect over the Bureau of Indian Affairs, which is supposed to see to the welfare of the various tribes. So whether she herself is guilty of any wrongdoing or not, or regardless even if she knew about it, it happenned on her watch, in fact, you might say, right under her nose. And so, despite what reasons she might have given as to the reason for her departure from the cabinet post she has held from the beginning of Bush’s first term in office, it seems likely that the Abramof fiasco has sudenly turned her into a liability, to the Department, and more importantly, to Bush, who still denies even more than a passing familiarity to Abramof, if that.

So, my guess is she had to go, before she was faced with a court order to turn over any documents which might now be helpfully shuffled into a bureaucratic labrynthe by her successor, who will of course be “unaware” as to their significance. It’s a longshot strategy, to be sure, but one that might save Ms. Norton possible jail time, and Bush further embarrassment.

However it all turns out, she will not be missed, certainly not by those of us who care for the environment of the world in which we all must live, however tentatively thanks to the likes of her. In fact, I would submit that she is probably the worse Secretary of the Interior in the last half century-and that is saying something.

But what is truly profound is that, taking the entirety of past Interior Secretaries in the context of the times in which they lived, she might well arguably be the worse of the bunch.

The Best Page In The Universe?

Well, it damned sure is if you are looking for a place where, sooner of later, you just have to feel insulted. I am talking about the website of the same name, written by a man that goes by the name of Maddox. The URL is

http://maddox.xmission.com/ (The link is supplied in the title of this post)

And it's well worth checking out. For one thing, it's funny as hell, This guy has been going since 1998, and seems intent on insulting every livng person on the face of the earth. He even has a page, a couple of them really, devoted to a critique of children's "art". You know, those generally terrible drawings little kids the world over do that we are all suppossed to outwardly pretend to admire and appreciate for the sake of their self-esteem.

He pulls no punches in his rants, for example as pertains to his hatred of various people-for example, Cameron Diaz. I have to wonder how serious he is, frankly I think he would knock me to the floor to beat me into the sack with her, so maybe a lot of this is frustration speaking. On the other hand, maybe not.

The amazing thing is, more than 4000 blogs have linked to his site, despite the fact that he obviously hates-yes, bloggers. The word blog, and all its variants, he counts as something he would support genocide of if they were people.

He hates Trekkies. He hates environmentalists. This guy hates everything, at least everything he puts on his website, it seems. So why should I promote him? Well, because he says a lot of things that I wish sometimes I had the guts to say, about different matters. Unfortunately, I have lately gotten into the habit of pulling my punches somewhat, in order to keep from ending up on the accurrsed "Flagged" list.

I want to thank Maddox for awakening me from this nonsensical reserve, which is a drain of energy and counterproductive. Why the hell blog if you can't be yourself? So-thank you Maddox.

I have restrained myself from e-mailing his site, though, to thank him personally, though maybe I should. Yet, he only prints hate mail, which he has a whole section devoted to, in which he individually, after displaying the e-mail from outraged viewers, picks it and the sender apart, in usually hilarious fashion.

Check him out, and prepare to be offended. Hell, it wil probably be good for you. Prepare to laugh as well, as I'm certain there will be some tidbits on this site that will make you say, "damn, that's just what I've been wanting to say".

And that, after all,is what makes this website so damned good. It's not what he says-it's the way he says it.

There Should Always Be A Place Called Hope

The childhood home of William Jefferson Clinton in Hope Arkansas, specifically the one in which he was born, is presently being preserved as a historical landmark, but this is solely through funding by way of privae donations. This may soon change, however, as a bill in the House of Representatives, HR 4912, has been proposed which would designate the modest home as a national historic landmark. This would qualify it to receive funding from the Depatment of the Interior, by way of the Parks Department, for it’s upkeep and presevaion, in addition to all the benefits that would apply.

This proposed bill has broad bi-partisan support, and is unanimously favored by the Arkansas delegation, as well as Republican Governor Mike Huckabee, who also is a native of Hope. The reasoning is sound. Clnitons life story is certainly an inspriring one, approached from the proper perspective. After all, Clinton was a common, everyday American citizen. He was certainly no blue blood, did not come from a financially secure background,to say nothing of a wealthy one, nor was his family from either side among the social elites, by any stretch of the imagination. His was a typical American middle class upbringing. Yet, through innate talent, determination, and strength, he climbed, some might say he clawed, his way to the top, and achieved the American dream.

Very few men have achieved this level of political prominence, from his background. In fact, his may be one of the few exceptions, along with Lincoln and Truman and possibly a handful of others. For this reason, the educational and inspirational value alone makes this a worthy bill for passage. Of course, there will always be naysayers, and you can expect that this would be no exception. But the Representative from Florida who stood up today on the floor of the House of Representatives was particularly adamant,that this bill should not be passed, until Mr. Clinton answers a number of questions, pertaining to the Dubai Port deal, which he seems to have been instrumental in brokering, for a fee, without having bothered to register himself as a foreign agent.

While I consider the Congresswomans points troubling, and worthy of consideration in another context, this is not the time. This was politics at it’s worse, in fact. I surmise this to be an obvious attempt to try to pass the blame from George W. Bush, who has certainly taken a hit about the Dubai Port deal , all the more so because of his stubborn insistence that he will veto any legislation that would seek to derail the agreement, over the objections of by far the majority of the American people. The Republican Party is scurrying for cover as we speak, trying their damndest to distance themselvs from the president on this debaucle, and seem to be united as almost one voice in oppossition to him, for once. But it is a tenuos situation for them, and they know it. The President can be bitter, petty, and vindictive against those who cross him, even those of his own party, maybe especially them.

Ask Jim Jeffords, the Senator from Vermont, who was practically forced from the Party for not marching solidly in lockstep behind Bush’s drumbeat. Ask Representative Peter King of New York, an early and staunch opponnent of the port deal, who has now discovered he must travel to Iraq on his own power, with no assistance from the Department of Defense.

Yet, they have no choice but to oppose Bush on this deal. Their consituents are ready for blood, demanding the deal be blocked, and many of the Congress have been put on notice, from both parties. The Republicans in particular know they are on shaky ground, for siding with this President way too many times. They have given him a blank check way too many times, with little to no accoutnability. And the people are pissed. Of course, in a way it’s the people fault, they made the Congress, and Bush, a kind of Frankensteins monsters, which turned on them. Now, the people have realized their error. The monster is in trouble. The monster must die. But he won’t go, not withot a fight. So what will this particular monster do in a last ditch depserate attempt to spare him his fate?

Well, in the case of the Gentlelady from Florida, she is doing what Republicans have been doing now for the last fourteen years-blame Bill Clinton. But it won’t work this time. She was called down repeatedly today, despite her persistence, and received rebukes from her own Party. After all, this bill, if passed, presents an economic boon to the city of Hope, in the form of increased tourist revenues and employment.

The monster is breaking down into all his seperat pieces, each fighting for his survival.

What was she trying to do, earn brownie points with the Bushes, in partiular the Presidents brother Jeb, who is the governor of her state? She insisted that she was acting out of concerns of her constituents as to the appropriateness of the bill. Really? Hell, now, how many of them even knew about it, really? I certainly didn’t know anything about it until I happened to catch it today on C-Span. First time I had ever heard about it, and I consider myself to be relatively well informed. I think the Gentlelady from Florida might be exaggerating. Probably having posed the question herself to a sample representation of her constituents, fron her Republican dominated district, she got the answers she knew she would get.

“Do you think it is appropriate to name the birthplace and chidhood home of former President Bill Clinton a national historic landmark in lieu of questions concerning his involvemnt in the Dubai Port deal,which he brokered privately, in addition to any other concerns you might have concerning Mr.Clintons character?”

“Why, no, Congresswoman, I don’t think it is right at all. Bill Clinton was a liar, a womanizer,and an all around scoudrel.”

People like the Congresswoman just don’t get it. Most people genuinely like Bill Clinton, even a great many of those that disagree with him politically. In a very real way, he is the epitome of the American dream. We don’t just love the man despite his warts. Hell, we love him because of them.

A View To Some Kills

THE BLACK DEATH (Scene From The Royston Tapestry)

According to latest research from a study conducted by a team from the University of Ultrecht in the Netherlands, the phenomenon known as the Little Ice Age of Europe may have been caused by the Black Plaque. The resulting depopulation of Europe due to the Fourteenth Century plaque caused untold millionsof acres on the continent to be deserted, thus unsettled, unpopulated, and untended, which allowed for the widespread growth of millions of trees on what had previously been mostly farmland. This soaked up the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, which would have had the effect of cooling the climate.

This has been ascertained from the study of pollen and leaf data. So, what does it tell us today? Well, it has occurred to me, for one, that we are now seeing the oppossite results. The constant lessenning of trees, the reduction in the rainforrests and continual deforestation in other areas, may in fact prove to be a contributing factor to the phenomenon of global warming that we see on-going today. This, in fact, may prove to be of more vital importance than the impact of pollution, or at least of as great importance. It is certainly somethig that should be considered.

Of course, even if this proves to be the case, there yet remains the question-what the hell are we going to do about it?

The Pyrrhic Victory Of Darla Kaye Wynn

Great Falls South Carolina. Most people have never heard of it, nor have they ever heard of a woman by the name of Darla Kaye Wynn. But the people of Great Falls South Carolina sure know who she is. She is known in fact, as the local practising witch, and something of a troublemaker, and all around pain in the ass.

Miss Wynn took the city council of Great Falls to court for refusing to stop the practice of including in the sessions a Christian prayer which mentioned the name of Jesus Christ. In fact, the prayers actually seem to have been to this deity, a fact that Darla Kaye, being a Pagan, took great exception to. This lead to her ultimate triumph in the courts, followng a round of appeals. It finally made it-almost-to the Supreme Court itself, but the Cout itself refused to hear the case, which meant the decision of the lower Federal Appellate Court would stand. Darla kaye Wynn had won her suit. But not without great personal pain and sacrifice to herself.

She was threatened, on various occassions, and her animals were killed. Coming home one night, she discovered that one of her caged birds had been killed, it’s head ripped off. Still, she persevered, until her final, to me, pyrrhic victory.

I asked her what the point was. She could certainly find a place more conducive to living her life as she saw fit, but she was adamant. Great Falls was her home and she would refuse to leave it, refuse to be pushed out by these Christian bigots. For a while she became a cause celebre’ in the Wiccan and Pagan community, and for a brief time, there emerged the ridiculous spectacle of her supporters from the religious rights group AREN (Alternative Relious Education Network) encouraging Pagans to travel to the city council meetings of Great Falls South Carolina to show their support. It was suggested that, at the end of the prayer in which Christ was invoked by “In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we pray, amen”, the Pagans would then stand, and bow, and answer, “In the name of the Goddess and the God, we pray, so mote it be”- but to otherwise not act in a belligerent or a confrontational fashion toward the denizens of Great Falls. As if this incredibly childish display were not confrontational and belligerent. I don’t know how many, if any, actually showed up to partake in this ill-advised foolishness, I know I did not., nor did I donate money toward this on-going charade.

I am glad the court decisions reached the ultimate conclusions that they did, don’t get me wrong. The point is, this was all so unnecessary, even to the point of being foolsih. Should the people of Great Falls South Dakota have allowed the City Council to invoke the Christian diety in a pulic prayer at a public meeting of public officials? Probably not. Was Darla Kaye Wynn right in objecting, and fighting the court battles in all its manifestations and appeals? Well, technically speaking, yes she was correct, and well within her rights to do so. But that still is not the point.

Like I told her, and like I told the members of the AREN Yahoo e-mail group, which I eventually left in disgust, there comes a time when you have to know how and when to choose your fights wisely. This was neither wise,nor was it necessary. It has fomented an even greater wedge between Pagans and the general Christian community than already existed, at least in this segment of the county where it is well known.For example, it is used as a batterring ram against all Pagans, as evidence that we all hate Christians, and are the enemies of Christ and Christianity. Therefore, we are Anti-Christ, and demon posessed, inspired by Satan, and all the other ignorance by which Wiccans and Pagans are confronted on a daily basis. Darla Kaye Wynn did not help to alleviate this problem, in fact, she exacerbated it.

Nor am I the ony one who feels this way, a good many Pagans have assaulted her in moer vicous ways than I ever could, or would. Some have even gone so far as to accuse her of actually being the one to kill her own animals in order to blame it on her Christian enemies. I would never go that far, without evidence, but by the same token,her actions certainly don’t seem to have taken their welfare into consideration. In fact, her lack of concern for them has been remarkable, to say the least.

Wynn has done some good work on behalf of pagans otherwise. As a member of AREN, she has been at the forefront of advocating for the rights of Wiccans and Pagans in prisons to freely practice their religion. That just makes this debaucle,sad to say, all the more unfortunate. In effect, it sems that this whole charade was a grandstanding effort at self-promotion, on the part of Ms. Wynn, and by extension, by the board of AREN.

Thankfully, in a technical sense, it worked out for the best. And to be sure, thee will come a time when Wiccans and Pagans will have to stand firm and stong to assert our own religous liberties. This, however, seemed to be not so much about asserting our own rights as it was about marginalizing those of others, a perceived enemy who has just been given more ammunition with which to disparage us. It was not the right fight at the right time. And in the long run, it may yet end up costing us dearly.

The South Carolina Seccessionist Movement

If a faction of ultra-conservative Christians have their way about it, South Carolina will soon secede form the nation of the United States of America for the second time in about 160 years. Naturally, this is ab ig joke, but it does bring up an interesting proposition. Just what if it were to happen? Suppose enough extremist right wing idiots actually migrated to the state in sufficient umbers that, in combination with native factions already disposed favoraby to the idea, they took control of the state of South Carolina, and actually seceeded. Or tried to.

I say let ‘em. Who the hell needs them? I mean, can you imagine anything more stupid than this group of clowns forming hteir own state, and convincing enough fools to go along with them to actually do it. After all, though, remember,it is a constitutionally sound pecept. The Tenth Amendment does indeed allow for secession from the Union for due cause, though Mr. Lincol saw fit to disrespect that precept on the grounds that it was not in the best interests of the nation, or of the Southern people, to allow it to go forward. Lincoln might have acted wrongly in this regard, perhaps he should as well have allowed the secession to go forward unhindered and unnoppossed. Does anybody truly believe that if it had,.slavery would still be a fact of life in the South, or anywhere else? I have long been of the opinion that, while slavery may have lasted a few decades longer, it would have eventually faded, and by now would have been long, long gone. Moreover, it’s ending would not have been near as painful, and traumatic, not only for the nation, but for the slaves themselves. After all,in a very real sense, slavery did not truly end until the end of the Jim Crow era, and the gathering momentum of the civil rights movement of the 1950’sand 1960’s. This culminated of course in the passage of such lanmark legislation as the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, under President Johnson. And even this did not end segregationa and racial prejudice, in fact, it is still an ongoing concern to this day.

Pehaps if Mr. Lincoln had left well enough along, this would not be the case, and race relations may have by now been nifinitely better than what they are now. In fact, I would submit that had he not taken the actions that he took, race relations by the 1920’s would possibly be similar to what they are now, in the present. There may not have ever been a Martin Luther King, for there may have never been a need of him. Or perhaps some personnage such as Booker T. Washington or George Washington Carver may have been the pioneering civil rights leader that King was in our era. Perhaps the major contribution of Mr. Washington may have been not so many uses for the peanut, but in influencing the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act. No Civil War, no regional and sectional animosities ongoing thoughout so many generations-no racial bigotry, at least not on the scale that we have lived through the past century.

Yeah, I know, if, if if. But the point is, if these fools in South Carolina do ever possibly get around to seceeding from the Union-or trying to-I say let them. I mean, face it, if that does indeed turn out to be the attitude of the majority of the people of South Carolina, who the fuck needs them anyway?

Then again, it all boils down to minority protections, as usual. Who would look out for the rights of these, for now, American citizens, in the event that day ever comes to pass? We certainly couldn’t trust the extreme right wing Christian Conservative government of South Carolina to treat them fairly. Sure, maybe they would surprise us and treat them with fairness and compassion, but we can’t rely on that proposition. Therefore, quite simply, we can’t allow it to happen.

I guess Mr. Lincoln wasn’t so wrong after all. Sometimes bloodshed is necessary, even admirable, even preferable-even commendable.

Just think of it as a catharsis.

The Christian State Of Missouri

Now it looks as though the state of Missouri is about to push the Supreme Court to the limit of endurance. How else can you translate the proposed new state law that would establish Christianity as the official state religion? What in the hell could they possibly be thinking? Obviously, this is a political calculation, though not a very realistic minded one. The point seems to be mainly to protect the rights of religious expression for the majority Christians, who to one degree or another have come to feel put upon in recent years.

Up to a point I sympathize with them. I have no problem with manger displays at Christmas in public parks, or with Chrisitan prayers at city council meetings, or with the words “Christmas”, “Merry Christmas” and “Christmas Tree” during the Christmas season. I am even okay with the permanent display of the Ten Commandments, provided it is erected and maintained with private money, and not state money,and also provided there are allowances for other religious displays as well.

But the wording of this new statute goes way too far, and seems to be meant to provoke dispute. The proponents of this measure are standing on very shaky ground, they just don’t feel it trembling under them yet. The point seems to be that the Constitution does not allow Congress to pass a law respecting an establishment of religion, but the states are under no such limitation, in that the Bill of Rights were meant precisely to protect the states from the encroachment of the Federal Government. Therefore, the states have every right to pass laws such as this.

Well, no they don’t. This dog not only don’t hunt, it has way too many ticks that should serve to suck the life force right out of it, and those ticks are called, in their entirety, the Bill Of Rights. After all, does a state or local law enforcement official have the right to come nito your home without a warrant,and search your person, and that of your family,and your property?

Can officials of the state or local government arrest you without due cause, or without a warrant, and hold you in jail indefinitely without even charging you with a crime, on mere suspicion?

Can local or state law enforcement officials beat you or starve you or otherwise torture and torment you as a legitimate means of deriving information from you, or to get you to admit to a crime?

Can local or state law enforcement officials keep you from seeing a lawyer?

Can local or state law enforcement officials, legally, put you on trial on trumped up charges, and not allow your attorneys to present contradictory evidence on your behalf?

Can the state or local government confiscate your properties for no good cause, regardless of whether or not you have been convicted of a crime?

Can the state or local government shut down and/or prosecute a local newpaper for reporting on the unjust way in which you are being unfairly targeted and penalized? Or for speaking out in any way or fashion against any of their abuses or corruption?

Can they arrest your friends, family, and neighbors, for speaking out on your behalf, or in any manner against them, on any matter?

Can the state or local government execute you in an excessively cruel, painful, degrading, and humiliating manner meant to cause excess pain and suferring?

Of course, the answer to all of these questions is, or should be, a resounding no. Yet, for some strange inexplicable reason, the proponents of this ill-advised Missouri state stature seem to think that the same limitations that exist on their authority as pertains to these and other matters, somehow does not apply to them when it comes to freedom of religion. That’s why this insane law shoud be quickly shot down, if it is ever actualy passed, and hopefully the politcal proponents of it will be sanctioned for wasting the time of the people, to say nothing of the courts.

Tobacco Punks

With all the problems that abound in Southeaster and Eastern Kentucky, you would think that 120 high school students from six different high schools could find more and better things to do with their time than circulate a petition aimed at ending smoking in publicbuildings. Yet, that is precisely what this group of ignorant little fascists have been doing, and have presented the petition to the Pike County Board of magistrates, who have as of yet to vote on the matter.

I bet’cha they’re Democrats, or come from Democratic households. Even on the off chance that I might be wrong, it doesn’t really matter. Of course, a significant number of Republicans, both conservative and moderate ones, are now on the anti-smoking bandwagon, and sure, a significant number of Republican politicians, if not most ofthem, are on board with supporting legal restriction, and outright bans, on this issue of personal private behavior.

So why then should I slam the Democrats? Because this is perceived as a Democratic issue, plainly. All the various lobbying groups that are behind this anti-smoking trend, and have been for years, are for the most part Democratic Party supporters-or better yet, make that Democratic Party controllers. Sure, more and more Republicans are getting on the bandwagon, but that bandwagon has been buildt and powered by Democratic Party lobbyists and supporters. So they, as they well should, get the credit for it.

Translation: Ever wonder why, despite President Bush’s woefully low poll numbers, the Democratic Party has not seemed to benefit in regards to their own favorabilty rating with the general voting public? Well, this issue is not the main reason for that, but it is a very improtant and overlooked reason for it. Especially here in the state of Kentucky-and, by the way, Tennesse, the Virginias, and the Carolinas. And everywhere else where smokers make up a potentially critical proportion of the voting population.

It may well also be the reason I decide to vote Republican in the next congressional elections, and maybe, if so-called liberal attitudes haven’t changed by 1908, that I may vote Republican in the Presidential elections for the first time in my life. I am at least very seriously considering it. If I do so, chalk it up to a protest vote against the arrogant hypocrits who have infiltrated, and more and more have come to dominate, my party.

Passing Up A Faith Based Initiative

During Bush's recent trip to India, he passed up a golden opportunity to establish a diplomatic rapport with the people of the nation. For a man who seems to want to assert his respect for the worlds great religions, he seems as usual-well, fucking clueless.

This despite the fact that, in the aftermath of 9/11, he happily reported to the nation that he accepted, as a gift from an American immam, a copy of the Qu'ran, which he assurred us all he would treasure in that it represented the true face of Islam, that of a "religion of peace".

"Islam", he almost whined until we were sick of hearing it, "is a peaceful religion". He seemed almost apologetic about his need to take the war to those terrorists who had "usurped one of the worlds great religions."

Bush, in fact, has almost bent over backards to reassure the "peaceful" Islamic majority. Hell, I halfway expected him to start praying toward Mecca five times a day-but on the other hand, when you look at the relationship between him and his family and the Saudi royal family-hee hee hee-he does.

This, then, goes a long way toward exlaining the vitriolic reception he has been given by the nation of India, or by a large percentage of them. Though Bush has in some ways been instrumental in encouraging dialoque between India and Pakistan to an extent none of his predecessors have done, the people could well feel that he has them over a-er,make that under-a barrel.

Bush could very easily have gone a long way toward rectifying this rift with the peopel of the worlds largest democracy, by, instead of the proposed visit to the shrine of Ghandi, he could have very diplomatically visited one of the temples of one of Hiduisms most beloved Gods-the elephant headed God Ganesh.

What could be more appropriate? Ganesh is, after all, the "Mover Of Obstacles", and Bush certainly has his share of them. He is also the "God of Fortune and Good Luck", and these are things that Bush is certainly in need of.

So why ignore the God? Is he afraid that this might somehow offend his right wing Christian Conservative and evangelical base? Well, it probably would, but then again, they didn't seem to be concerned about his seeming near conversion to Islam. Is he afraid of the Muslims? Uh, yeah, probably. But remember, Bush is a no-nonsense type of man who isn't going to sit back and take a lot of guff from terrorists or their sympathizers.

What could be more appropriate than for Bush, the standard bearer of the Republican Party, whose symbol is the elephant, to visit a temple dedicated to the elephant headed God of India. But hey, look back up at the picture-he's missing a tusk. Now how did that happen? You see, like the elephants head itself, this is symbolic. It means that Ganesh is the God that vanquishes dualism, in other words, those contradictory impulses by which mans spiritual nature is ever at war with his physical, material aspects.

Hell, maybe a trip to this God would be just what the doctor ordered. Maybe it might even turn things around for him, not only in India, but here, and throughout the world. Maye the Muslims will start to realize they had better start to play nice. Maybe Bush's detractors in this country would see him as a man with at least some sense of the absurd, reminiscent of his trip to Africa where he was witness to two representatives of his party's mascot getting it on. He seemed to get quite a chuckle out of that one, which I saw as a sign of hope, that maybe he wasn't such a stuffed shirt, pompous hypocrit after all.

One temple in India recently had an idol of the God stolen, which I reported in an earlier post. Perhaps a visit to this temple might be appropriate,with the gift of a new idol, and Bush attending the ritualistic purification and dedication ceremonies.

Perhaps when Bush returns to this country, he could weigh in about the need for sensitivity toward the ever growing Hindu population here. For example, a beer company recently pulled from production a brand of beer, called Ganesh, which featured on it's logo an image of the God with one bottle of beer in one hand, another bottle in it's trunk. A lawsuit was threatened as a result in May of last year. Of course, there were no death threats, nor dire warnings of the nations destruction-just a bunch of that darned old complaining.

Still, it shows that the Hindus, here and there, take their religion and it's Gods and Goddesses as seriously as Chrisitan, jews, and Muslims take their one.

Uh Oh-whoops! I think I've just hit on something. To recognize a Pagan God-such as Ganesh-would be contradictory. After all, the case can be made that the God of Islam is the same God as that of Christianity and Judaism. That's why they are all called the Abrahamic religions.

Abrahamic religions, of course, don't believe in idolatry, which is the worshop of idols-such as those that portray the elephant headed God Ganesh, for example. I guess that's why when a zoo in Oklahoma recently incuded a pictue of Ganesh, a bunch of fundamentalist Christians lobbied for inclusion in the gallery of pictures with a Christian theme. And why a bunch of like-minded fundamentalist Christians in Cincinnati took to the conservative local radio talk shows and moaned and bitched about how the people in Cincinnati voted to name the newly born elephant at the zoo, yes, Ganesh.

And it all boils down to the Ten Commandments.

"Thou shalt make unto thee any graven images of anything, either on the earth, or under it, or in the seas, or in the skies."

Sorry if I don't have the wording of this exactly right. Hell, I don't even know for sure whether it's the Second, Third, or Fouth Commandment. I'm not a Chrisitan, you see. No, thank you, I dont want to be one. But I do understand Bush's reluctance to pay the appropriate respect to the people of India by visiting a temple of one of their Pagan Gods. It would just be bad form. After all, George Bush, the promoter of such ideas as "Faith Based Initiatives", while wanting to assure us all he has respect for all religous beliefs, finds himself at the head of a party that supports the placing of the Ten Commandments in public parks, courthouses, and public schools. Visiting the Temple of Ganesh, or any other Pagan God, would put him in a dilemna with his base. So he has to avoid this at all costs, even at the expense of passing up the opportunity to show respect to the people of India, and their own culture and heartfelt beleifs and religous values.

It's called, in a word, hypocrisy.

George W. Ghandhi

The difference in the reception of George W. Bush to that which greeted Bill Clniton in ealier days during visits to India is remakable, stark, and worrisome. As was the case of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the first U.S. President to visit the world’s largest democracy, Clinton was greetef by cheering throngs of smiling, dancing admirers who threw rose petals at him. If somebody had thrown something at George W. Bush, he would have been well-advised to duck. Instead of enthusiastic welcomers, Bush was confronted with the spectacle of tens of thousands of Indians, of all religious faiths, proclaiming him to be a murderer and a butcher.

How did it get to this point? If anything, I have always been of the opinion that Bush should be given a modicum of credit for enouraging dialoque between the governments of India and Pakistan. This was doubtless due to the seeming decisivenness in which he dislodged the vile and despicable Taliban from their perches of power in Khandahar, as this set up within the region the atmosphere by which the two nations could be jointly discouraged from any further provoations, which usually are centered around the region of Kashmir, which both claim.

India in particular is a nation I have long suspected might one day become a world powe. It is, after all, the second most populous country in the world, with now over one billion people. It is also one of the largest antions in the world in terms of land mass, and has considerable natural resources at it’s disposal. They are also sufficiently aggressive when it comes down to matters of their own self-defense. Three times the nation of India has beentt he decisive victor against its hated rival Pakistan, and one time in the early nineteen sixties it sent the communist Chinese governemnt of Mao-Tse Tung retreating from it’s borders which it had unwisely invaded.

A number of facrors have prevented India from becoming a world power on a major scale. The first thing would have to be it’s religious based caste system, which has not only relegated a substantial majority of the population to a marginalized status, but has ensured that the nations abundant resources have been contained to the benefit of the ruling elite. This and a series of natural disasters, mostly due to monsoons, but also alternately drought, have hastened and enhanced the effects of famine and pestilence. If the Four Horsemen of The Apocalypse had a headquarters, India would be the place.

The fact that they weret raditionally divided into warring states made them easy prey to fall to such conquerors as the Muslim Moguls, and later the British, who were in their own way as responsible for keeping the nation destitute as any, until the coming of Ghandhi.

Ghandi set this nation on it’s opriginal road toward the world status that it will doubltess eventuallly acquire, and at the expense of the U.S., as they stand to become an economic powerhouse, and one of our most worrisome competitors. Rest assurred, they have not forgotten that, since the days of the Nixon Asdministration, our nation has typically sided with the Pakistanis, despite the fact that India was by far the most open society, and the only true democracy in the region. Payback is a bitch.

For a brief time, Clinton seemed to have reversed the trend, and though Bush has not been anti-Indian, they seem to have somehow decided that this President is the one they should take their frustrations and resentments out on. Irony of this is, while I am not a supporter of George W. Bush, and I resent his lies and deceits by way of the Iraqi War, and the fact that he has failed to sufficiently follow through with the Afghan successes, and failed to devote the resources necessary to shore up the security of that fledgling new democracy-I wonder how this is of concern to India. While Bush has shored up, or attempted to anyway, his partnership with Musharraf of Pakistan, this does not seem to have been at the expense of India. Again, if aything Bush has encouraged dialoque between the two long bitter rivals. The dialoque and admittedly tacit cooperation between the two seems ot have progressed toa more positve point than at any time previously.

This would probably be the reasoning behind the proposed Bush visit to the tomb of Gandhi. Bush’s detractors say this is the height of hypocrisy, that a war-mongering President such as he has been should not step foot near the tomb of such a great man of peace. Ordinarily I would agree. Yet, in just this one instance, given Bush’s role in encouraging dialoque and diplomacy between the two, even over such a profoudly contoversial issue as the Kashmir region, his presence at the tomb may, in fact, be unusually appropriate.

Stumbleupon

Well, this is my first real post using Performancing, so what else to talk about but the Firefox browser. If you don't have it, download it, it's free. No, I don't work for them, and no, this isn't turning into a commercial blog. And actually, Firefox is only the secondary focus of this Blog post, but it's an important one,for reasons I will get to later.

First, I want to heartily recommend a site I've discovered called Stumbleupon. It's a really great site, and if I used my Performancing fuction correctly, there should be a link to the site somewhere on this post.

So,what is Stumbleupon? Well, it's hard to explain, but think of it as a web-community, a kind of club, where people share their web-sites. You can rate web-sites, and review them. If you see a web-site you like, you can click on the "I Like" icon. In the event this is a new web-site to Stumbleupon, and you're the first person that has suggested it, you will receive a prompt asking you to write a review. After you have done so, then the site will appear on your own homepage on the site, and you can easily develop a ist of sites.

If the site you are reviewing has been suggested before, then of course this won't happen, but it will still be included in your Homepage in a list of sites you like.

Another feature is the stumbleupon button. You can select acording to category, or just choose all, and upon clicking this icon, you will be presented with a site that has been submitted. Again, you can click on the "I Like" icon, and include it in your ist of favorites.

And speaking of categories, there is every one you can imagine, including porn.

And there are also groups you can join, of all kinds. I haven't spent a lot of time on these, because truthfully I just don't have that much time to spend on things like that, but the option is there.

Now, back to Firefox. This is the browser, and the site, by which I downloaded Stumbleupon as a Firefox extension. Is it necessary to have the Firefox extension in order to download Stumbleupon? I don't know, to tell you the truth. I suspect that it is, though. But even if it is not, I recommend you download the browser, and for that matter make it your default browser.

For one thing, it is a secure site, at least compared to IE, and to most others as well, I suspect. And when browsing a variety of web-sites, such as the kind you will find at Stumbleupon, security concerns are nothing to sneeze at. Porn sites in particularly are notorious for spyware. So caution is advised.

Besides, there is just too much good shit to download from Firefox to pass it up. Stumbleupon is just the tip of the iceberg. But it's a good place to start.

Example Note 2-Performancing

This is an example of a normal text note

I was going to delete this test, as I didn't actually mean to post this. I was more or less testing a new extension from Firefox, one called Peformancing. It is a Blog editor, and I would recommend it, except for one little problem. First, the positive aspects.

It saves you a lot of time Blogging in the sense of time it takes to post to your blogs. In fact, you don't have to leave your home page with this handy little extension, you can stay right there, or whatever web-site you happen to be on at the time, and post away. That can be real nice if you are on a web-site and see something that puts you in Blogging mode. Just post to your blog while you are there at the site, immediatley. Comes with a lot of nice features, like del.icio.us and technorati links. You can even add an image url.

Unfortunately, and it might just be a coincidence, but the time it took me to get from my blog to this editor page was excruciatingly slow. My computer screen now knows I consider it a motherfucker, without a doubt, because believe me, it heard me-it had to.

Is this because of the extension? Who knows? If it slows things down to that extent, though, I'll have to ditch the extension, which is a shame, because this is a really nice extension. otherwise, or would be. Just have to see how things go from here on out.

Under Mao's Thumb

You’d think Mick Jagger wouldn’t need the money, so I gues the only other reason he and the other Stones are agreeing to appear in concert for the first time in the People’s Republic of China would be-well, okay, tons more of it, you kow what they say, the more you have the more you want? A case could be made that they are doing this out of appreciation and respect for their millions of fans, and to spread the gospel of rock and roll. If that is the case, I guess I don’t blame them, but it irks me.

This is not the first time they have had the chance to appear in China, the first time was in the late 1970’s. Then, however, it was the Chinese whpo pulled the Oiental carpet out from under their feet. Remember, this was just a little more than a decade after the “Cultural Revolution”, and its slingering effects were still manifest on what passed for Chinese culture, which is still playing catch-up. It was greatly feared that the Stones would infect the people with decadent Western cultural and spiritual values.

So, I guess that the Stones appearrance can be considered a significant achievement, although there are songs they have agreed they will not perform. They are:

Let’s Spend The Night Together

Brown Sugar

Honky Tonk Women

Beast of Burden

These are considered, at least by the Chinese, I guess, as the Stones most sexually explicit songs. But hell, the Stones have always been sexually explicit, it’s their natures, and these are some of their best numbers. It’s enough to –uh, ahem – make a grown man cry.

But it’s not all dark, as in fact, two numbers that are considered among the Stones darkest compositions:

Under My Thumb

Sympathy For The Devil

Have evidently been approved.

One things for sure, they better not ever play those two in Havana.

Orlando-A Show Of Asses

Give people an inch and they’ll want a mile every time. That’s true of a great many if not most people, and I guess it can be said that the same is true of White Nationalists. Not content with having the same rights to protest and Freedom of Assembly as do the rest of us in this country, they have taken it on themselves to extend this right in the city of Orlando Florida by attempting to demonstrate in a predominantly black neighborhood. These seem to be the same peole who have stirred such a hornests nest by demonstrating in Toldedo Ohio, an action which resulted in the burning and looting of busineses in a predominantly minority neighborhood, by anti-racist protestors made up largely of minorites, and egged on, reportedly, by anarchists and other outsiders.

Things came to a head in Orlando, however, and a number of fights broke out between the two factions, resulting in five arrests. Now, there comes a time when common sense should prevail,though it rarely does, and, regardless of Constitutional rights, the major concern of local authorities will always, and should always, come down on the side of public safety. There is absolutely no reason for white racialists to conduct a march in a predominantly black, or other minority, neighborhoods.

Their message will just as easily get out if it were held in an atmosphere less inflammatory. And, by the way, it will still draw counter protests. There is still plenty of reason therefore to insure public safety by police presence even in these instances. But it would seem that the White Nationalist movement is aiming for more than just a demonstration, march,and rally to get their message out. The only explanation is that they are hoping for this kind of response as a way of demonstrating, for the world to see, just how animalistic, how savage, are the racial minorities whose presence they wish to protest, or , if not their presence, at the very least the “special rights” they complain the minorities seek- which to be fair perhaps all too many do.

After all, the major focus of the demonstrations is a protest against the crime that is so pervasive in minority neighborhoods, according to the white racialists, compared to that which exists in white majority neighborhoods. Doubtless they feel that the counter protestors will always play into their hands by proving their point for them. The fact that it is a very small but vocal segment of the minority popuation that does this is besides the point. And the racialists have a point that these neighborhoods are to a great extent controlled by drug gangs.

But this is pretty much common knowldege anyway, and their insinuations that this is the typical minority attitude and lifestyle is disingenous. I’m all for cracking down on the drug gangs, in the harshest terms imaginable. But residents of all neighborhoods deserve to live in an atmosphere that is not only free of crime, but free of unnecessary provocation that could inadverdantly lead to violence, destruction of private property, and the potential loss of lives of innocent-and law abiding-American citizens.

Embryonic Stem Cells And The Wounded Warrior

I have to wonder, just how wounded American soldiers feel, particularly those sufferring from paralysis, when they hear George Bush obstinantly declare that “respect for all human life” extends to the embryonic stage, and so precludes the “destuctiom” of stem cells for the purpose of harvesting them for research. Despite the fact that the very research being limited by the denial of federal funds is the very thing that might bring about a cure for paralysis, or for any number of injuries sufferred by the American soldiers George Bush proclaims to have such love and respect for. There is even the possibility that stem cell research might actually lead to the growing of limbs that might replace those that have been lost. Could an American soldier, say for example one totally bereft of arms and legs, and possibly paralyzed to boot, not consider this position and feel anything but dismay and anger?

This is a subject, and an angle, that has been seemingly skirted even by the Left. Possibly out of respet for the soldiers, or perhaps in some cases American soldiers are seen by a good many of them as brutal and willing partners in crime of the Bush Administration-so they deserve what they get.

Whatever the case, I think it is appalling that these veterans are denied the opportunity for treatment and hope for recovery that may turn out to be only possible by the utilization of this pioneer scientific technique. Especially when you consider that most of these stem cells are either destined to be destroyed, or will in time become worthless. Freezing them, after all, only saves them for so long, as with anything else, they will die, become worthless. Freezing them only slows down the process, it doesn’t prevent it.

Lately, the opponents of stem cell research have taken to airing commercials which features a wheel chair bound woman, who may so far as I know be nothing but an actress. I have never seen her name, and know nothing of her history, as to how she became dissabled. She asserts that, while of course she would like to have a cure, she would not like this to come at the cost of the destruction of innocent life-i.e., embryonic stem cells. There has been reseach into other areas of stem cells, adult stem cells for example, that have offerred grea thope of finding eventual cures, while embryonic stem cell research has produced not a single one.

With all due respect to this lady and her private health issues-whatever they are-that’s easy for her to say. I’m sure she was well paid for her participation in this bit of disingenous propoganda, and I have no doubt she is well cared for, both in terms of medical care and the bills for such, if indeed that was ever necessary in her case. Put it this way, if she was in debt before, I doubt she is now.

Regardless, it is not for her to speak for anybody but herself. Certainly, she has no say as to the moral obligation of Bush and his supporters insofar as what they owe to the members of the American military, nor for that matter does anybody else, especially for those who have sacrificed whateever hopes they ever had of living a normal and healthy life, for the sake of the Neo-Con dream turned to nightmare, and resulting in all too many private hells.

The Bush and conservative Republican position on this issue is arrogant beyond belief.

Those Evil Human Animal Hybrids

After watching George Bush for more than five years now, I’ve come to one very important conclusion. This is a very simple man, and you can easily know the truth of what he says. You just use this simple procedure-whenever he opens his mouth, the exact total oppossite of what he says is more than likely the truth. Whether it’s the Iraqi conflict, the Katrina debaucle, or environmental policy, he says exactly what he thinks most people want him to say-and then he does the exact oppossite. There are some apparent exceptions to this, of course, such as his oppossition to federal funding for stem cell research, but even in matters such as these, when he says he does not object to private ventures-only to use of federal funds-you can detect the hint of a wink and a nod.

This premise leads me back to a subject I have thought of at some length ever since the last State Of The Union Address. In pointing out the ethical dangers inherent in technological improvements and scientific advancements, in this modern age, and the need to insure against possibel abuses, he warned us all about the evil prospect of- the creationof animal/human hybrids.

The minute this came out of his mouth I wondered in amazement, where the hell did he dig that up from? Is this evidence that he is coming unhinged at last, or that he is, after all, a dry drunk, as has been suggested? Is it conceivable that such secret scientific experiments are on-going, and that he is setting the stage for plausible deniability of any personal knowledge in the event of a leak?

Then I got to thinking-why not? What would be the harm? I can think of a lot of good that could come of such research, and as such, I offer my thoughts on such such a potential-I call it:

THE HUMAN BIRD

Now what could be more thrilling and filled with greater potential of improving on the human species than this utilization of one of the oldest of mankinds dreams-the ability to fly like a bird? Not in a plane, helicopter, or glider, but with your own set of fully developed wings. The military applications in and of themselves make pursuing this possibility worthwhile. Imagine open air battles between warring armies, shooting at each other up in the air, far lesseningh the prospect of innocent loss of lives, as for the most part civilian non-combatants will be far more enabled to leave the scene of the conflict.

People would get far more exercise than they currently do. The pleasure of flying about the neighborhood or the countryside would take on entirely new dimensions, as it would allow one to take in more territory than is currently reasonable by walking, bicycling, or even by automobile. There would be time to make a few incidental stops at the market, make it to appointments, and work, on time, all in such a way that would lessen highway traffic congestion, to say nothing of pollution. Then, there would be the savings as to energy expenses.

Of course, people being people, the novelty would soon wear off in most cases, and those set of wings would pretty soon become about as useless as-well, as a pair of arms and legs.

On the other hand, maybe not. Toddlers will quikly learn to fly, and by the time they are two it will be a full time job chasing them down, literally, from the sky. Of course, soon they will be eight, and ten, and twelve, and then puberty sets in, so parents wings might get overworked, if anything.

And speaking of childcare, why stop with wings? Why not go the full route, create a human bird hybrid that, instead of carrying their young for nine months, will when becoming pregnant, simply lay an egg? Bingo. I think I see what the Neo-Cons are up to now. No disturbance of the work force, no pesky maternity leave for businesses to have to contend with. Just insure that all expecting families have access to affordable quality incubators-or, for that matter, incubation centers. Voila-an entirely new industry, with the potential of adding tens of thousands of new jobs to the work force.

Damn! I think I’ve hit on what might well end up being the one positive aspect of the Bush legacy.

South Dakota v. Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood has vowed to fight the recently passed law in South Dakota, in which abortion is to be banned in al cases except for those cases where the mothers life is I jeopardy. The governor has vowed to sign the bil into law, after ensuring that there are “no loopholes”.

Loopholes? What in the hell is he talking about? It seems pretty cut and dried to me. Is he wanting to make sure, perhaps, that there will be a second or third opinion from a qualified physician to verify the first diagnosis? If so, that in itself could be one hell of a loophole, assumming these second and third opinions are coming from physicians hired by the state. If this is the case, from where will these phsicians be taken? What willl be their own philosophies in regards to the procedure? I shudder to think about it.

And why not allow the procedure in the case of rape? Are they really that afraid that some women will claim rape as a means of getting around the ban if they allow this exclusion? I suspect this is true in some cases, but the sad, sad truth is that, for the most part, a good many well meaning people actually believe that rape does not justify an abortion. After all, it is not “the baby’s fault.”

And what of incest? Now, it would be pretty easy to verify this. But it is still, alas, an innocent life. An innocent life that will still, nevertheless, pass on dangerously defective DNA into the general population, perhaps to manifest two or three generations later, if not immediately-but innocent nevertheless.

Thankfully, this law will be overturned on appeal, and most observers believe this will be upheld by the Supreme Court. But people are stating to pay for very close attention to recent rulings bythe Court on life and death issues, especially those involving choice and privacy, such as the recent vote on the Oegon asisted suicide law. In addition, the court is due to hear a case involving a ban on late term abortion procedures.

The up-and-coming off year congressional elections promises to be a busy one. Look for an increase in voter paticipation this year. And look for any further Bush judicial appointments to be scrutinized even more than usual, including those to the Federal Appelate courts. Those are the ones that are, after all, perhaps as important in their own wayt, if not more so, than the Supreme Court potentials.

Hugo Chavez And Citgo

Just today I got a forward that is evidently making the rounds that is so obvious anybody should be able to tell what it’s purpose is, plainly put, pure propoganda. The target of this smear piece is Venezualan President Hugo Chavez, and as if to make some kind of point as to it’s sinister implications, it includes a photo taken of the Venezualan Socialist dictator in the company of the American Iraqi War protestor Cindy Shehan.

As stated, however, the text of the forward is a warning about how Chavez suppossedly wishes to bring down the government of the United States. It goes on to remind the reader, if unaware, that Venezuala is the government owner of the Citgo convenience franchise, which owns a string of combination convenience stores and gas stations throughout the United States. It suggests that by patronizing Citgo, a customer would by proxy be supporting a company owned by a government whose stated purpose is the overthrow of the United States. In effect, the profits of the company would either directly or inadverdantly go toward this purpose. Obviously, the patriotic thing to do would be to rufuse to shop at the Venezuelan owned company.

Okay, there are several problems with this story. For one, Chavez never, to my knowledge, advocated the overthrow of the Untied States government, he merely advocates overthrow of United States imperialism, and in point of fact, his main objection to United States influence in South and Central America would seem to be in oppossition to such free trade agreements as NAFTA and CAFTA. That is a distinction with quite a bit of difference, at least in practical terms, if not in sentiment. Of course, Chavez is a Socialist, and would like to see the United States eventually become Socialist, as would Fidel Castro-another name brought up in the forward as an earstwhile ally of Chavez. Then again, the US government would, undoubtedly, be happy to see Venezuela adopt a more Democratic style of government. Of course, Chavez came to power by way of a democratic election, so let’s be clear. What the Bush Administration wants, wtih a Democratic veneer, is what it wants here, and what it wants there, and what it damned well wants everywhere-

Unregulated Capitalism!

Yeah, what moves this country has made in that direction over the course of the last twenty five years has worked real well, hasn’t it? Uuuhh-not really. Not unless you can with a good conscience discount that 8 trillion dollar national debt that just keeps piling up. But who’s counting?

Chavez wants an end to free trade, it would seem, as do I, as do the majority of Americans. So how is he our enemy? The answer is, of course, he is not, he is merely the foe of all those American corporatists that want to insure a continual flow of cheap foreign labor into our borders, and open permission to establish production facilities in countries where they can produce their goods at a fraction of the cost of what they would have to pay to produce them here, with American workers. I’m not so naïve, of course, to suppose that Chavez cares one whit about the American people. I will, however, give him credit for caring about his own, and certainly he cares about the prospect of his power in the region being maintained, and not undermined by American Realpolitik, as he suspects was the case when he was briefly overthrown, before staging a quick recovery of his power and position.

So who is behind the propoganda? It would be too easy to say pawns of the Bush Administration, but this ploy is too cheap for a major government operation. It is tempting as well to attribute it possibly to a ploy by Ameican oil companies, trying to seize the opportunity to marginalize to as great an extent as possible a competitor, one who will not fall into line with their price fixing schemes and manipulation of the markets.

Something this cheap, this cheesey, looks more like the work, to tell you the truth, of a regional BP manager,for example, out to increase his revenues. A regional ploy, which brings me back to Ms. Sheehan, whom I mentioned at the start of this post. I myelf have had my criticisms of her-and still do-but I like to consider that they are thoughtful, not foaming at the mouth vendettas that are typical of so many on the Far Right, who fall into line with anything certain ones tell them-certain ones like Pat Robertson, for example.

And that is pretty much where it stands. The irrelevance of Cindy Sheehan’s inclusion in a circulated internet drive to encourage a boycott of Citgo marks it as a Far Right ruse, if not by Robertson or his ilk, then probably by a minor player, like my mythical regional BP manager.

And what it all boils down to is this- I will purchase my gasoline from whatever company offers me quality product at the most affordable price. Now that is something any business person should be able to appreciate-the Bottom Line

Jessica Simpson-On The Road Again?

It looks now as though a major show trial is destined to take place on American soil, one involving infidelity, celebrity, and possibly even perjury. There seems to be an inconsistencie in the accounts of Nick LaChey and Jessica Simpson as to when they were actualy legally seperated. According to Smpson they were seperated in mid-Novmber, but acording to LaChey they were seperated in December, some three weeks later. So why the discrepancy, and why is it important?

Well, because Jessica made, in just that span of time, one and a half million dollars, therefore the time is indeed vital. If they were legally seperated according to her acount,then LaChey would not be entitled to half of that million and a half dollars that he otherwise would be if his account is the correct one. Remember, these are the seprerate claims made in legal court filings. Of course, it may be hard to prove perjury in any case. More than likely, the case will all come down to a finding of fact. And here’s where it might get interesting.

Yeah, I know there are some people groaning right about now, those that are still reading. But I just can’t help mself, as I consider this might possibly be one of the all time great Hollywood sex and scandal stories of all time. Or maybe not. It could be something as mundane as two people that simply grew apart, became dissafected and, as happens so often in the world of celebrity entertainment, went their separate ways. There may be no affairs as such that are pertinent to the case.

On the other hand, there just might be. An affair,that is. And I’m not talking about with Johnny Knoxville. Or Kermit The Frog. Now, the goofy little kid in the Pizza Hut commerical,that would be a scandal. But no, I’m referring back to an earlier post on this subject, in which I revealed my beliefs that Jessica Simpson, during her filming of the big screen version of The Dukes Of Hazard, engaged in an affair, not with co-star Johnny Knoxville, but with another co-star: Willie Nelson.

I repeat (and will continue to do so until I sell this story to the National Enquirer), it has all the elements you could hope to find in a celebrity gossip piece. And it makes sense. You take Willie, the seasoned, veteran entertainer, put him in an on location trailor with Jessica, the grasping, ambitous would be starlet and celebrity brimming over with enthusiasm, and looking for career advice, as pertaining to both music and film. Add a little pot, a llittle, or maybe a lot, of liquor, into the mix, and voila. You think Willie wouldn’t go for that? You think Jessica wouldn’t, for the possile chance to tour with Willie, to have him produce one of her albums, and play on it, and for a chance to appear on one of his?

And who the hell is Johnny Knoxville anyway? Okay, he’s another dime a dozen Hollywood stud, like Jesica Simpson doesn’t have more than her share of opportunities for that. But Willie. I can just see it now, that old, withered flesh and gnarled, grizzled face, commingled with the sculpted beauty and squeaky clean image of Ms. Simpson. Yeah, I can just hear that old movie lot trailor boucing around right now.

On the Road Again? Just can’t wait to get on the road again-

The life I love is making music with my friends-

I can’t wait to get on the road again

Willie,this is your chance to make yourself relevant again. Stand by Ms. Simpson, and tell us like it was. Sure, it won’t prove anything as to which account of the time of the legal seperaion is the correct one. But who cares? When the truth gets out, it might be cathartic, you might be able to get those two crazy kids to reconcile. After all,they are Hollywood types, they are enlightened. They will get over it. Jessica will thank you. Nick will thank you.

Well, okay, they probably won’t. But the world will.

Me, I’m just going to think about it and masturbate.

Any Port In A Storm-A Terrorist Scenario

Now that Bush appears to be possibly looking for a way to wriggle out of the latest announced deal to hand over the running of six major U.S. ports to a company owned by the government of the United Arab Emirates, according to the latest trial balloon released by the White House (Bush didn't know about the deal, suppossedly, until it was finalized, according to White House sources), one can only hope that he will decide to do the sensible thing-for once-and put an end to this ill-advised venture. At the very least, he could be persuaded to not veto any Congressional bill forbidding the project. Hopefully the measure would pass by a large enough margin to override a presidential veto, in any event.

Otherwise, this has the makings of a potential disaster of epic proportions. Consider the possibilities. A Dubai company takes control of six major ports, a number of which are located in the Gulf of Mexico region. Typically, only seven per cent of the cargoes that enter U.S. ports are inspected, even in this post 9/11 world. Somewhere along the line, terrorists come into the picture, bribing officials in Dubai to insure they have visas that will pass scrutiny. They make it to this country, and await further instructions. They all ready know what to look for, a ship which contains a thermo-nuclear device. Their pre-arranged mission: to insure it's safe passage into the port of Miami, for example.

The ship is docked at the port, it's legitimate cargo unloaded, it's secret cargo safely hidden away. Then, inadverantly, it is ordered to remain docked, as it is discovered to be in need of repairs. Coincidentally, it is now the beginning of hurricane season.

Before long, a hurricane is spotted, or a tropical storm that eventually becomes a hurricane. One of these eventually comes dangerously close to the port of Miami, or a least close enough that it can be quickly reached. The ship departs, and before anyone realizes what is happenning, it follows a path that will take it right to the path of the on-coming hurricane. It might be a category two,or three, or four, or even just a weak category one. The stronger the better-but it doesnt really matter. The ship strays, with seeming great carelessness, into it's path. Or, it stays right where it was docked, in the port of Miami, and awaits the approaching storm.

Before the storm reaches landfall, however, or before it reaches the part of the Gulf to where the ship makes it's eventual way, disaster strikes. The long hidden and disguised-and protected-thermonuclear device explodes, unleashing the fury of the atom right in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico, or the port of Miami-right in the path of the storm.

When that storm finally hits, the temperature of the water that it eventually passes over has been heated to an unimaginable degree, hotter than ever. For a time the water boils, and the ship is totally vaporized, along with all people on board. By the time the storm finally hits the area, there is nothing that can be done, but watch and wait. The water is no longer boiling away, but it is still extremely, excessively hot, steaming hot-and radioactive.

Then, the hurricane hits. It roars quickly up into category five status, and may even warrant the creation of an entirely unheard of category six, or seven. It engulfs the entire Gulf Coast in a blanketing wave of hot and radioactive wind and rain. Winds and rain of utter annihilation.

The Gulf Coast is left all but uninhabitable from this point on unto the foreseeable future, as the hurricane makes it's way up into the interior of the country, up into the Midwest region, perhaps even up into the upper Midwest, possibly as strong still as a category three hurricane, or even greater. Eventually, in it's rage, it spews out an uncountable spawn of devastating tornadoes.

The land is flooded, the winds howl as the nation is brought to ruin-and to it's knees.

And so writes finis to the record of George W. Bush, the terror warrior President-and to the nation as well.

But nahhhh-we shouldn't assume the worse about an "ally" on the war on terror. Right, George?