Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Hollywood Celebrity Named In Rape Accussation

So far, William Donahue has been, not the lone, but the major voice of outrage against the involvement of a certain Hollywood star on charges of involvement in rape, but you can be certain that other voices are silently circling the carcase from a safe distance, ready to swoop down at any minute and devour the rot. Such people as Brent Bozell, Joseph Lieberman, James Dobson, Hillary Clinton, and Jerry Falwell, will doubtless soon join the ranks of the numerous other seemingly outraged, screaming voices who demand justice for both the perpetrator and the victim. So far, the trial, which is currently being conducted solely in the court of public opinion, has barely begun.

The preliminary evidence is said to be overwhelming and, in fact, was caught on film, and yet, oddly enough, seems to not offer any solid, hard evidence that a rape actually occurred. It is shadowy and dark, with just enough visual evidence to infer a rape. A zipper is unzipped, a girl is pinned to the ground, is heard to plead in vain for her assailant to stop. Yet, despite what seems to be an obvious sexual assault caught on film, it offers no conclusive proof that a rape actually occurred. There is no actual or obvious visual nudity revealed on the film, according to the latest accounts.

Still, as the old saying goes, a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich, so if this were to ever make it that far, there can be no doubt that the preliminary evidence that a rape did indeed occur seems to be overwhelming. As such, both the victim and perpetrator has come under much scrutiny over the last few days, and in fact, I now present what might well be aptly described as a mug shot.










Of course, the accusations of inappropriate use of a child in a violent sexual performance are aimed not intentionally at her, but at the film, the filmmakers, and the overall culture of Hollywood. Also under scrutiny is the mother of Dakota Fanning, who was also present when the scene was filmed for the movie Hound Dog, which is about an Elvis obsessed young girl with no mother, living with her no-account white trash father and alcoholic grandmother. The Film recently premiered at The Sundance Film Festival

Dakota has defended her mother and her role in the film, and has even gone so far as to express feelings that it was a positive experience for her, and that she hopes the movie will have a positive impact, that people will learn something from it.

Hey, Bill Donohue, did you hear her? She enjoyed it. Ain’t that sad? On the other hand, we should have seen this coming, huh? The first warning sign was when she appeared in a movie starring Tom Cruise. That was perhaps the earliest indication that she may be in dire need of help.

All these detractors obviously have her best interests at heart. They quite understandably would prefer that she follow the tried and true formula for successful child stardom of the past, as followed by such former child stars as Gary Coleman, Todd Bridges, Dana Plato, Danny Bonaduce, and the legions of other child stars of the many family oriented sitcoms of the fifties and sixties, for example, who went on to lead productive, successful lives and made so many positive contributions to society.

After all, how many of these former stars do you know of who went on to become despondent, suicidal, drug addicted, alcoholic, abusive, sexually obsessed personal wrecks? Not many, I would wager. That is because they were involved in heartwarming, positive, family oriented and morally appropriate shows such as Father Knows Best.

They would never allow themselves to be lured into such a degrading position as being portrayed as the victim of such a horrendously appalling crime as this. After all, what kind of message does this kind of film send? Why, your average movie goer might be left with the impression that such terrible acts as this happen every day in America and around the world. And furthermore, what if child molesters go to see this movie and are turned on by it? Why,they might go out and commit a rape. Now you tell me, what is the likelihood that such people as this would commit such a horrible, despicable crime if they never saw this film?

As for the danger Miss Fanning herself might be put in from potential stalkers, who is to say that upon seeing this move, they would be able and willing to wait until she reaches an appropriate age before they make their perverted moves on her?








Somebody needs to pursue some kind of intervention on the behalf of Dakota Fanning, and the other child actors and actresses who are raped every day by Hollywood and deprived of their childhoods in a very real way. By following appropriate legal channels and by enacting positive, family oriented life affirming laws aimed at protecting American ideals of morality and decency, perhaps the government can enact a child welfare strategy that might best be modeled after the old cult intervention techniques of the past known as “deprogramming”.

Of course, that is what people like Bill Donahue are valiantly trying to do now, but they need our help. Such government intervention would put an official stamp of approval on it. Of course, there will be cries of censorship. And it goes without saying that young stars like Miss Fanning will find this very objectionable in the short term. In fact, I have little doubt as to what her initial reaction to such an intervention might well turn out to be.



"HELP!! I’M BEING RAPED"!!!!

But, well, we can’t let that stop us from doing what is best not just for her, not even just for child stars in general, but for children everywhere. In the long run, I’m sure they will all be grateful. I’m sure deep down, Miss Fanning will be grateful as well. Deep down, I think she really needs it.

In fact, somewhere deep down inside, I bet she’s secretly begging for it.

10 comments:

Rufus said...

And the weird thing is that the child porn laws are so badly worded that they could possibly be charged for making this movie.

SecondComingOfBast said...

They were investigated in North Carolina, where the movie was made, and evidently found no evidence that any laws were broken. It stands to reason they wouldn't really be that stupid. This is just Donahue and some others trying to get attention by crying foul where no true foul exists.

sonia said...

Ten years ago, there was a film by Angelica Huston called 'Bastard out of Carolina' (starring then 11-year-old Jena Malone) which also depicted the rape of a child. There was some controversy about that too...

Interestingly, both films were directed by women. Male directors probably would neer dare tackle such a subject. Much better to sweep it under the rug...

SecondComingOfBast said...

Very interesting, Sonia, I'd never heard of that film. The current film had a hard time finding funds, I would imagine the one eleven years ago would have been considered even more ahead of it's particular time, and I would be surprised if it received a wide distribution, which would account for why I hadn't heard of it.

I can just hear the extremist freaks now if it had.

SecondComingOfBast said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Rufus said...

I could be wrong about this, but I think that if Oklahoma, for instance, defines child pornography as any depiction of sex with a minor, whether it's real or simulated, then they can bust the distributors for "distribution of child pornography". And I don't think that there's one nationwide standard. Again, I could be wrong about that. But, I'm wondering if this movie will even find distribution.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Rufus-That's a good point, and I think you're right, actually. But as long as the film isn't distributed in Oklahoma, to stick to your example,they would have no grounds to file a court action. So it could be they (the films producers) might have to take the steps of having the film screened in advance, and otherwise going through all the appropriate legal channels. I don't know for sure though.

sou said...

the first time i saw her was in rufus wainwright's video "across the universe" and thought who is this kid with a woman's face.. she has no expressions you associate with children..

but the thing is.. if she had turned to spirituality than hollywood.. if she was exposed to the scary emotional mess that humans at her age.. we'd be much more hesitant to think of it as a rape of her childhood (!)

i missed coming here..

SecondComingOfBast said...

Sou-As you might have surmised, I really think the whole controversy is actually quite silly, and even insulting. This is just a way for Donahue and others of his ilk to raise money and a stink.

As for Fanning, it's not so much her looks as the way she presents herself, very intelligent and adult-ish. She is still a child, of course, just a very grown-up acting one.

I'm glad you're back, I missed seeing you on here. By the way, I recently got AIM. If you have an account, I might IM you sometime.

sou said...

actually i moved a bit away from the post and was contemplating the childhood of all children who are exposed to a atypical lifestyle..

anyway..

AIM? hmm.. i don't have an AIM ID.. but you'll find my mail id and yahoo msngr id on my profile page..

ping me anytime.