Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Is Wright Appearances Meant To Derail Obama?


No sooner did I post about how reasonable Jeremiah Wright seemed to me on Bill Moyer’s Journal on Friday Night than he comes out and seems determined to make an ass of himself in an appearance at The National Press Club. Admittedly, I did not see the entire appearance, so what I saw might be another example of a few snippets taken out of context. Whether this is or is not the case, something smells here.

What is behind this latest round of appearances? Who invited Wright to appear before the National Press Club? I find if difficult to believe that he extended an offer to appear there on his own initiative. Somebody else was behind the invitation. Who was it? Why was he invited to speak there? What is the reason for Wright’s combative rhetoric at such appearances? There are two possible explanations.

*The Clintons are behind it. I know this sounds like a crazed conspiracy theory, but it should not seem so far-fetched to those familiar with the Clintons. If they are behind it, is the Reverend Wright a willing co-conspirator, or is he a dupe? I tend to think it is the latter. The Clintons have a lot of friends within the ranks of black American leadership, and could be calling in favors from among those acquaintances of theirs who have an influence with Wright. Is that really that hard to believe? There are undoubtedly many within the black community whose lives and public careers intersect with Wright and the Clintons. How difficult would it be for such a person to convince Wright that he should make such appearances in order to defend his good name and his good works within the black community? This could be explained on the grounds that his silence might be misconstrued, and at any rate, he should not sit back and accept Obama’s political enemies using him, the Reverend Wright, as cannon-fodder, as a pawn.

Wright himself might even be a willing participant, as far as that goes. The Clintons and their allies have deep pockets, after all, and the Reverend Wright is no saint, however good a man he might or might not be.

*There are a lot of elements within the press whom I would suggest are desperate to see a Democratic victory in November, and some of these folks, many of whom have promoted Obama in the past, now might be experiencing a kind of buyer’s remorse. Viewed in the context of the last ABC debate, this too might not be as far-fetched as it might seem at first glance.

When you view the way George Stephanopoulos conducted himself in the interview on ABC, and consider the fact that he was a former Clinton staffer, it could be a little bit of both. Remember, at one point it was Clinton the press was accused of being rough on, and being easy on Obama. Now, it seems the press has changed horses in mid-stream.

Oh, and where was it the Reverend Wright appeared? Oh, yeah, it was the NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, wasn’t it? Thank you.

The Reverend Wright and his associates within the black American leadership, by the way, have their own ax to grind that might explain their seeming willingness to derail Obama’s candidacy. After all, ask yourself, do these people really want an improvement in American race relations. Obama obviously would like to see that come about.

Do the Clintons and the Reverend Wright, along with their friends and supporters-including the press and other elites-share his views? Do they really want race relations to improve? For that matter, do they really want to improve the overall lives of black Americans?

Is it possible that Obama is really in the minority when it comes to these issues, that he is perhaps one of the few genuine reformers in the country? Is it possible that he really wants to see blacks-gasp-take responsibility for their own lives, families, and communities, as opposed to languishing as class victims on government life-support?

Come to find out, I am not alone in my suspicions as to the possible agenda behind Wright's recent appearances. This has also been suggested by Politico, in addition to the New York Daily News.

There even seems to be a known culprit in the form of the Reverend Barbara Reynolds, a Clinton supporter and National Press Club member who just happens to be responsible for Wright's appearance. She is pictured at the top, sitting by Wright at the Press Club event.

She earlier has even gone so far as to denounce Obama for distancing himself from Wright on her blog.

What’s going to happen next? Maybe Bill Ayers might decide to go on another bombing rampage for old time’s sake. Maybe there will be a resurgence of the Weather Underground, one that will take up where the old incarnation left off with bombings of the Pentagon and other public buildings.

Maybe they’ll bomb the Clinton Library. You know, just to throw us all off the track.

13 comments:

Bigmo said...

Wright is an Uncle Tom Clinton lover and does what many blacks know how to do, bring down their own kind. He loves the Clintons since they fit the image blacks see themselves as. Collar greens, corn bread and fried chicken and everytime they see another brother rise they have to bring him down. Blacks need racism to justify their economic and social failures, failures they bring to themselves. Like 2pac Shakur said, its my own kind doing all the killing here.

It also is the hatred and envy that dominates black life that Wright represents. Blacks leaders always hated Obama because he rose in this nation while they lag behind preying on themselves.

The hell with that Uncle Tom acting like he is some militant. He ain’t nothing but a player hater.

Everywhere in this world their is oppression but many blacks can’t go on because they can’t fight the demons in them. The demon that make them rob each other, hate each other and abandon their own kids. The demons that makes them envy those among them who shine.

Frank Partisan said...

I think Obama as the Democratic Party front runner, should control the discussion. His unwillingness to discuss important issues is telling.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Ren-

He's disowned Wright now, what else can he do? The people that are controlling the discussion are the media, as always. They decide everything, from what the American people hear about to what questions are asked at the "debates".

Mohammed-I agree with you. And I am not really an Obama supporter, though I sure as hell find myself defending him a lot these days.

Hellfireblogs said...

Obama is a typical college liberal and I think he thought he could trust Wright and that Wright would fall into line when push comes to shove. I kinda feel bad for him.

But as a Bi-racial person myself I find his association with Black Nationalist prideless at best. I'll never get over being disgusted by that.

And Mohamed, It's collard greens. Seem to me for a supposed Black guy you're full of stereotypes and unaware of the reality of Black culture.

It's almost like you're not Black at all...

SecondComingOfBast said...

Rob-

I'm not really sure, but I think, just guessing from my stat-counter, that Mohamed is from the United Arab Emirates. Of course, he could be an American soldier stationed there.

Also, I think it's Tupac, not 2pac.

Obama is obviously a liberal, of course, but I do give him some credit for wanting to make a difference, until he gives me reason to feel otherwise.

If you get a chance, check out that link to Reverend Barbara Reynolds blog. These are the kinds of people that would prefer somebody like Obama not piss on their gravy train. I very much think Wright can be included among their number. After all, if Barak becomes President, who are black kids going to look up to more, him or, say, Al Sharpton?

Omama can do something, as President, that no white president feels comfortable doing-tell them to get lost. They can turn black voters away from a white President that pisses them off. They might not find it so easy to turn them against a brother that don't want to play their games.

I guess what I'm saying is, this is a lot of the reason for what's going on here. Read the lady's blog, and she pretty much makes it crystal clear. Except of course when she deletes her posts, like she did a recent February post in which she bragged about voting for Hillary in the Maryland primary.

The association with Ayers and Wright, while troublesome, doesn't bother me nearly as much as his closeness to Ted Kennedy, and his recent pandering to the San Francisco elites. Now that bothers me.

Rufus said...

Obama might not be able to say it, but he's Al Sharpton's worst nightmare. If he becomes President, Sharpton's gig is over, along with a lot of other people. I think the times are changing, but we'll see.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Rufus-

That's exactly right. These people know that if Obama is elected, he has to be President of all the people, he can't afford to agitate on behalf of one group one hundred percent of the time, therefore he can not kowtow to them, nor would he have to treat them with the deference most Presidents feel they have to treat them.

Their hold over the black community therefore becomes lessened considerably, and for good reason.

An Obama presidency could well be like a veil lifted, with the sudden onrush of light making the cockroaches scurry for the corners. It's sad that these people depend on such much misery in the black community to hold on to their power, but after a while it becomes obvious what's going on.

It would almost be worth it seeing Obama elected just to see all this come about. The long term benefits, insofar as race relations, improvements overall in the black community, etc., would very possibly in the long run more than make up for any negative aspects of it.

Bigmo said...

Excellent presentation by a black scholar about Obama:

http://fora.tv/2008/01/18/Shelby_Steele_on_Why_Barack_Obama_Cannot_Win

Bigmo said...

Although I do not completely agree with the overall analysis privided by Steele, it does show how the black american landscape looks at politics and race identity between what he refers to as the bargainers which he believes Obama is, and the challengers represented by the likes of Sharpton, Farakhan, Wright and others. I still believe Obama can win. And perhaps Steele is among those whose concept of America can not see a black man being president.

As far as those who ask whether I am black or not, well what do you think?

Many blacks also hate Obama because his mother is white and father was an african immigrants. Many blacks in America think african immigrants get preferential treatment because they are not the ancestors of slaves. Its always one thing or another, never their fault though. Mnay africans can wonder how a society that has all this opportunities no other blacks have can be complaining as much as they do. Blacks in Africa as we speak are fighting over a loaf of bread. But know from this lecture I understand why its so.

Interesting how Steele talked about how racism is a powerful tool blacks can use to corner whites and silence them and to get from them major financial concessions and race programs. Though many of the black problems are rooted in history, its just that they have overplayed their hands this time by going down in history as the only ethnic group thats bringing down Obama.

Brilliant lecture though, although his conclusion might have been a little far reaching.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Mohamed-

Who wins will have a lot to do with the prevailing conditions in the country and the world at the time of the election.

As for whether you or black or not, it doesn't matter. I'm not black, but that doesn't stop me from giving my opinion.

You seem to be from the United Arab Emirates, or at least that is the location of the proxy by which you come to this blog. I am guessing you are either an African Muslim living in Dubai, or possibly a black Muslim from America studying there, or possibly a black American soldier stationed there.

It's all really irrelevant, as I appreciate your input regardless.

Rufus said...

Pagan- Thought you might find this amusing:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/04/opinion/04rich.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&ref=opinion&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin

Rufus said...

Well, cut & paste that link I guess.

SecondComingOfBast said...

Rufus-

Good looking out. No problem, the link worked fine in my Yahoo notification e-mail. I've just checked it out, in addition to some of the links in Rich's column. I'll be doing a post on it, and I'll link to you.

I'm going to see if I can find a "Great Whore" picture with Hagee to go along with it. Thanks.